L300 Go References

  1. O’Dell MW, Dunning K, et al. Response and prediction of improvement in gait speed from functional electrical stimulation in persons with poststroke drop foot. PM&R. 2014;6(7):587-601; quiz 601. doi:10.1016/j.pmrj.2014.01.001
  2. Teasell R, et al. Evidence-Based Review of Stroke Rehabilitation: Executive Summary, 18th Edition. Heart & Stroke Foundation. 2016; 1-66
  3. Bethoux F, Rogers HL, et al. The effects of peroneal nerve functional electrical stimulation versus ankle-foot orthosis in patients with chronic stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2014:28(7):688-97. doi:10.1177/1545968314521007
  4. Kluding PM, Dunning K, et al. Foot drop stimulation versus ankle foot orthosis after stroke: 30-week outcomes. Stroke. 2013;44(6):1660-9. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.000334
  5. Hausdorff JM, Ring H. Effects of a New Radio Frequency– Controlled Neuroprosthesis on Gait Symmetry and Rhythmicity in Patients with Chronic Hemiparesis. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2008; 87(1): 4-13
  6. Dunning K, et al. The Functional Ambulation: Standard Treatment versus Electrical Stimulation Therapy (FASTEST) Trial for Stroke: Study Design and Protocol. J Clin Trials. 2013; 5: 39‐49
  7. Everaert DG, Stein RB, et al. Effect of a foot-drop stimulator and ankle-foot orthosis on walking performance after stroke: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2013;27(7):579-591. doi:10.1177/1545968313481278
  8. Hausdorff JM, Ring H. 2006. The effect of the NESS L300 neuroprosthesis on gait stability and symmetry (abstract included in CSM 2007 Platform Presentations). J Neurol Phys Ther. 30(4):198. doi:10.1097/01.NPT.0000281266.34830.4b
  9. Yan T, Hui-Chan CWY, Li LSW. Functional Electrical Stimulation Improves Motor Recovery of the Lower Extremity and Walking Ability of Subjects With First Acute Stroke. Stroke. 2005;36(1):80-85. doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000149623.24906.63